May 2, 2003
Inuit employment in government moving backward
NTI and GN use implementation
contract in bid for more training money
JIM BELL
Richard Paton, NTI's chief operating officer, with Hugh Lloyd, the government
of Nunavut's director of aborginal and circumpolar affairs. Both say Article
23 is failing.
(PHOTO BY KIRSTEN MURPHY)
|
The Nunavut government and Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. are pulling out all the stops
in an effort to pry millions of dollars a year out of the federal government
for Inuit job training.
To help accomplish that, they've added a powerful new weapon to their arsenal
a massive report called Annaumaniq, prepared for NTI and the GN by PricewaterhouseCoopers,
a national management consulting firm.
The report finds that territorial and federal governments are failing miserably
in their attempts to implement the Inuit employment provisions in Article 23
of the Nunavut land claims agreement.
"It's important to note the reality that Article 23 is failing,"
said Richard Paton, NTI's chief operating officer, during an April 25 press
conference held to release Annaumaniq.
The battlefield where they'll use that weapon is a two-year-old set of talks
aimed at producing a new implementation contract for the land claims agreement.
Those talks ground to a halt in January.
"The negotiations stalled, and we looked to this process as one in which
we would like to re-start the negotiations," said Hugh Lloyd, the GN's
director of aboriginal and circumpolar affairs.
The implementation contract is a legal document between NTI, the GN and the
Government of Canada. It sets out who's supposed to do what, and when, in carrying
out the terms of the land claims agreement, and how much each party should pay.
The first implementation contract, negotiated in early 1993, expires on July
9. Negotiations aimed at creating a new one began in March 2001.
But it was a disagreement on how to deal with Article 23 that caused those
talks to break off in January.
"Clearly, one of the issues was Article 23," Lloyd said.
In the first implementation contract, Ottawa provided only $160,000 over 10
years to implement Article 23. Lloyd said NTI and the GN believe that amount
to be "grossly inadequate."
To carry out the Inuit employment provisions of Article 23 over the next 10
years in a way that's acceptable to NTI and the GN, the federal government will
likely have to spend many times more than that.
"Estimates of training costs suggest many, many millions of dollars would
be needed on an annual basis - $10 to $20 million probably.... We'd be looking
at substantially more, perhaps $20 million a year. So that is a big jump,"
Lloyd said.
Will Ottawa make that "big jump?" NTI and GN officials say the chances
are good.
"We feel very strongly that the position we're taking on the importance
of Article 23 must be recognized by the Government of Canada.... We remain very
optimistic that we will get the assistance that's needed," Lloyd said.
Most of the statistical evidence they're using to support their case is contained
in the Annaumaniq report. NTI revealed parts of it in January during a public
budget consultation in Iqaluit with John Manley, the federal finance minister.
The report confirms the damning indictment that was suggested in the figures
NTI released at the time.
"[T]he implementation of Article 23 has demonstrated a lack of progress
which amounts to a failure of implementation," the report says.
The long-term goal of Article 23 is to achieve a level of Inuit participation
in government jobs equal to their proportion of Nunavut's population. Right
now, that's about 85 per cent.
But the Nunavut government can't reach even the modest target of 50 per cent
it was supposed to achieve by April 1, 1999.
On that day, the proportion of Inuit employees in the GN stood at 45 per cent.
Now it stands at only 42 per cent.
"This is more than a failure to move forward; it is moving backward,"
the report says.
The federal government's record is even worse.
In 1999, 61 per cent of the people who worked for the department of Indian
and northern affairs in Nunavut were Inuit. Now that number stands at 27 per
cent.
Only 33 per cent of federal employees in Nunavut are Inuit.
And in each government, most Inuit employees tend to be concentrated "in
a narrow band of lower skilled occupational groups and at the lower grade levels,"
the report says.
That means the average salary rate of Inuit in government jobs is 78.5 per
cent of the average rate earned by non-Inuit, who dominate higher-paid jobs.
The report finds that the cost of these disparities is stupendous. In 2002-03,
Nunavut Inuit lost $123 million in wages and housing subsidies because of the
large number of government jobs that went to non-Inuit.
That produced $65 million in extra social costs for government, including social
assistance, lost income tax revenue, and turnover-related hiring expenses.
And a table in Volume 2 of the report projects that over the next 10 years,
if the current low levels of Inuit employment in government continue, it will
cost Inuit a whopping $1.2 billion.
|