June 13, 2003
No protests for pension
plan amendment
Bill
passes in Baker Lake
PATRICIA
DSOUZA
CLICK
PHOTO TO ENLARGE
Protestors
outside Iqaluits legislative assembly in March, 2002 express their opposition
to a generous supplementary pension plan that MLAs had just given themselves.
(FILE PHOTO)
|
MLAs easily passed Bill
39, An Act to Amend the Supplementary Retiring Allowances Act on Friday,
legislation that could both lead to their defeat in the next election and make
them instantly wealthy.
It will become law after
Commissioner Peter Irniq gives it royal assent.
Four MLAs opted out of
the supplementary pension plan, which was passed last March amid great controversy
and protest. But only three MLAs voted against the amendment.
Iqaluit Centre MLA Hunter
Tootoo voted in favour of the amendment because it adds a layer of transparency,
requiring the speaker annually to read out the names of all MLAs who have opted
in to the plan.
The other two Iqaluit MLAs,
Paul Okalik and Ed Picco, as well as Quttiktuq MLA Rebekah Williams, raised
their hands in opposition to the bill when a vote was called.
All four left the chamber
as the bill was being discussed in committee of the whole.
The amendment allows MLAs
to collect their pensions within five, 10 or 15 years after ceasing to be an
MLA. By choosing the early option, young MLAs could rake in hundreds of thousands
of dollars the full amount they are entitled to if they live to age 69.
But, of course, they have
no way of knowing how long they will live.
In addition, the money
they would collect would be grossly in excess of the amount they have contributed
out of their own earnings and would consist largely of government funds.
In March 2001, Iqaluit
East MLA Ed Picco told members that he voted against the enriched plan because
his constituents asked him to.
A majority of my
constituents have said they dont support the pension raise. Im dissenting
because my constituents told me they dont support it, he said during
the committee of the whole discussion of the bill.
While MLAs discussed the
bill inside the chamber last March, protesters carrying neon signs marched in
front of the legislative assembly, decrying the attack on public funds.
During the discussion of
the amendment last week, there was no such dissent. The bill passed silently,
without any public comment from the four MLAs who opted out.
Tootoo later said that
he wished he had opted in and collected his supplementary pension in a trust
fund to be donated to charity. However, once an MLA opts out of the fund there
is no going back.
But thats a rule
decided by the current assembly. Members of the next assembly, to be elected
in February, could rewrite the rules, or throw out the supplementary pension
plan entirely.
Anything could happen.
And its all up to the voters.
|