June 27, 2003
GN should intervene
in airline business, report says
Transportation minister
takes cautious approach in relations with air carriers
JIM
BELL
In response to a Government
of Nunavut study that urges aggressive government intervention in air transportation,
Peter Kilabuk, Nunavut's transportation minister, is opting for a cautious go-slow
approach to improving services in Nunavut.
The study, by LPS Aviation
Inc. of Ottawa, says the deregulated free market in air transport is failing
Nunavut, and that northern airlines aren't likely to improve service if left
to their own devices.
Citing the Kivalliq region
as an example, they even say that competition, where it exists in Nunavut, has
failed to produce lower air fares.
"While Kivalliq communities
enjoy more frequent service by up to three different air carriers, average air
fares in the region are the highest in Nunavut," the report says.
Saying it is "very
doubtful" that moral suasion will convince airlines to meet Nunavut's needs,
the report concludes the territorial government must use aggressive, but risky,
strategies to fix the air transport system in the territory.
"An escalating strategy
of progressively increasing intervention is recommended to achieve improvements
in air services provided in Nunavut," the study's authors say.
Though this "intervention"
could include subsidies, or a government-owned airline, the study's authors
say the GN's best tactic is the use of its own purchasing power to offer preferential
contracts to airlines that supply improved services.
That could even include
a Nunavut-wide contract to one big airline that would serve all 26 communities
and all southern gateways.
But Kilabuk said the government
wants to use consultation and co-operation first.
"This would almost
be a last-resort kind of thing for us, because at this time, we want to make
sure that our airlines in Nunavut have the full opportunity of being part of
the consultations to improving the system in Nunavut," Kilabuk said.
Those consultations started
this week. On June 25, officials with the GN's transportation department met
with representatives of Nunavut air carriers to discuss the report.
"That's where they'll
be discussing a lot of the report and a lot of the recommendations," Kilabuk
said.
The next step, he added,
will be for the government to issue requests for "expressions of interest"
from airlines.
"The air carriers
and their representatives will be asked to forward to us their ideas and suggestions,
and also to make proposals on how they can improve service," Kilabuk said.
That could include suggestions
on better connections between eastern and western communities in Nunavut and
a better Iqaluit-Sanikiluaq connection.
This doesn't mean, however,
that the government is ready to sign contracts with airlines in exchange for
better service.
"This being an expression
of interest, it doesn't lock us into any contractual arrangements with the airlines,
so it will be to look at what the airlines see as being beneficial to them and
also for their clients, and also for the government."
The report also says that
many Nunavut runways must be improved before air carriers can invest in newer
aircraft. "The major limiting factor for jet aircraft operations are the
current airport facilities, particularly gravel surfaces and short runways."
That is why big air carriers
like First Air and Canadian North are still using 30- to 40-year-old Boeing
727 and 737 combi jets to serve Nunavut.
But these aging aircraft
are reaching the end of their lifespans. "Current jet aircraft serving
the territory will likely be phased out of service over the next decade as they
reach the end of their useful life," the report says.
The report discusses, and
rejects, options like direct subsidies, a return to price and route regulation,
and public ownership of an airline.
But it does recommend the
use of "contractual incentives," ranging from multiple airline contracts
in select routes and markets, right up to one big contract with a preferred
carrier.
The report writers did
about 400 consultations with community representatives over the past three years
and heard numerous complaints. They include:
- cargo and air fare
costs are too expensive;
- compassionate travel
costs too much, even though both major airlines offer discounts;
- mail is often bumped
from aircraft due to lack of space;
- fresh produce arrives
late;
- intoxicated passengers;
- food cargo is held too
long in Iqaluit;
- not enough service in
Inuktitut;
- overloaded planes;
- inadequate runways and
airport buildings;
- cargo is often bumped
in favour of alcohol;
- the airlines aren't
trusted when they claim that planes are fully booked;
- arrival times change
without the community being notified;
- airlines don't handle
dangerous goods and medical lab supplies with enough care.
"I'm very pleased
with this report, because it has been a good starting point, or foundation,"
Kilabuk said.
Click
here to see summary of Nunavut air transport report.
(Acrobat pdf)
|