July 11, 2003
Nunavut court sends
NTI firearms case to trial
Inuit exempted from
gun registration until case is resolved
PATRICIA
D'SOUZA
Nunavut Tunngavik Inc.
will get its day in court to argue against a federal firearms law that requires
Inuit to register hunting weapons, after Justice Robert Kilpatrick rejected
a motion by the federal government to dismiss NTI's court action.
"This court is satisfied
that there is a genuine issue for trial involving both mixed fact and law that
is properly left to the trial court to resolve," Kilpatrick said in his
reasons for judgment, filed with the Nunavut Court of Justice on July 8.
In addition, he granted
an interim stay in the application of the federal Firearms Act to Inuit.
The act requires that gun owners register their weapons or face fines or imprisonment.
This most recent stay is
essentially an extension of one granted late last year before the legislation
went into effect on Jan. 1. It means Inuit will not have to register their guns
and will not face criminal charges for hunting with an unregistered gun until
the matter goes to court sometime next year.
NTI contends the law violates
Inuit hunting rights set out in the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement. Section 5.7.26
says Inuit do not have to obtain licences or pay fees to hunt and fish.
The federal government
argues that Section 5.7.26 says firearm control laws may be used to attach limits
to the use of guns by Inuit.
In deciding whether to
impose a stay, Kilpatrick had to decide whether a refusal to do so could be
so harmful to Inuit that the effects could not be remedied after trial.
NTI said Inuit rely on
country food for cultural as well as physical survival. However, the federal
government argued that Inuit could just as easily shop for food at a grocery
store.
"Those Inuit unable
to access firearms can always use commercially available foods as an alternative
to that ordinarily obtained through Inuit harvesting practices," Kilpatrick
said, in describing the federal government's position.
"Implicit to this
argument is the assumption that Inuit throughout Nunavut have ready access to
a commercially available food source on a consistent basis."
He added that many Inuit
continue to face language and literacy barriers in completing firearms registration
forms, and despite efforts by the Canadian Firearms Centre to provide assistance,
those barriers still exist.
"To the Inuit hunters
adversely affected by this legislation, the loss or impairment of a traditional
lifestyle upon the land would mark the end of living and the beginning of survival,"
Kilpatrick wrote.
"To the extent that
the core values of a hunting culture are damaged or weakened, the elders and
hunters revered by contemporary Inuit society for their traditional knowledge
and on-the-land skills would see their skills devalued and their place in Inuit
society diminished. These groups would be at risk of becoming mere anecdotes;
anachronisms of a bygone time and a lifestyle that is passing."
NTI and the Government
of Nunavut, which is an intervenor in the case, cheered the decision and reflected
on the symbolism of Inuit rights being upheld just one day before the 10th anniversary
of the land claims agreement.
And in an even more symbolic
move, NTI and the GN praised each other and the work they had accomplished together.
"We are pleased to
be working with NTI to ensure that the rights of Inuit under the land claims
agreement are upheld," Premier Paul Okalik said in a press release on Tuesday.
"We appreciate the
Government of Nunavut for their support," said Cathy Towtongie, president
of NTI. "We've worked very well together throughout this process and we
have to continue to do so in the months ahead leading up to the main court action."
Towtongie said the court
recognized the most significant factor affecting Inuit - the high cost of living
in Nunavut.
"I don't think at
this time Nunavut Inuit can afford any more cost of living. Sixty-four dollars
may not sound like a lot in the South, but $64 can buy diapers and bread or
pay for a licence," she said.
"I think the comparison
between the southern standard of living and the Nunavut standard of living is
not realistic. Can't be. I can't see a family of five going down to the Northern
and buying a $25 steak."
Hana Hruska, director of
communications for the department of the solicitor general of Canada, said the
ruling does not change the current situation. She refused to comment further
while the matter is still before the courts.
|