July 25, 2003
Sign or else: Consent form deadline looms next month
Critics say NIHB form
violates privacy rights as well as Nunavut land claim agreement
JIM BELL
This is the cover of the brochure, available in English and French only, that
Health Canada is sending out to explain why they want Inuit and First Nations
people to sign away their privacy rights to receive NIHB-funded health care.
|
Inuit patients in Nunavut have less than five weeks to sign a mandatory form
surrendering their right to medical privacy, or run the risk of being denied
essential medical care.
Called the "NIHB Program Consent Form," the document gives Health
Canada bureaucrats and numerous Health Canada agents and contractors
permission to look at sensitive personal information contained in medical
files.
"The whole process is unpalatable, and I believe it does infringe on the
privacy rights of those individuals who are being required to sign them,"
said Elaine Keenan-Bengts, Nunavut's information and privacy commissioner, in
an interview this week.
Keenan-Bengts has no jurisdiction over Health Canada or any other federal agency.
Her job is to act as a watchdog over territorial governments only, to make sure
they do not abuse personal information stored in territorial government filing
cabinets and electronic databases.
But as a privacy rights expert, she's convinced that the NIHB consent form
violates privacy rights, and that her fellow privacy and information commissioners
across the country share this view.
All aboriginal people in Canada eligible for health care benefits under the
NIHB program, including Inuit and First Nations, must sign the form. In Nunavut,
the deadline is September 2003.
Those who don't sign it may be denied NIHB benefits. In Nunavut, that could
amount to a denial of basic medical care. Those who choose not to sign the form
can pay for the services out-of-pocket, but most Inuit can't afford the enormous
cost of the services the NIHB pays for.
In Nunavut, it's the NIHB that pays for patient air fares, prescription drugs,
dental care and vision care.
Keenan-Bengts says the worst part of the scheme may be the enormous pressure
placed on Inuit clients who may be denied medical care, especially essential
medical travel, if they do not sign the forms.
"It's not freely given. It's not given with a full understanding of the
consequences, and it's clearly a violation of privacy. I mean, who knows what
this information might be used for?" Keenan-Bengts said.
A staff member at the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada said this
week that they have received "a number of complaints" about the Health
Canada consent forms.
The staff member, who did not wish to be identified, could not say whether
those complaints were made by organizations or individuals, and could not comment
further.
Opposition to the consent forms among Nunavut and Inuit leaders has been sporadic
and uncoordinated.
The latest organization to denounce the plan is the Qikiqtani Inuit Association.
In a letter to Anne McLellan, the federal health minister, signed by Thomasie
Alikatuktuk, QIA's president, QIA lists six legal objections to the NIHB consent
forms:
- The consent form violates Inuit privacy rights.
- The consent form violates the federal government's fiduciary obligations
to Inuit by attaching a condition to the provision of essential health care
benefits.
- The consent form violates Article 32 of the Nunavut land claim agreement.
- The consent requirement is an illegal "seizure" of personal medical
information under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
- The "consent" obtained by signing the form is not given freely
or voluntarily, and is therefore legally invalid.
- The consent form discriminates against Inuit, because other Canadians do
not have to sign such a form to get essential medical services.
QIA is asking that the NIHB consent program "be discontinued immediately."
As of Nunatsiaq News press-time this week, QIA's president, executive
director, and director of social policy were all on annual leave and could not
be reached for comment.
In Nunavut, nursing station staff have been stuck with the job of handing out
the consent forms which are written in English and French only - and
getting people to sign them.
That means it's not only Inuit patients who may not understand the privacy
rights that Health Canada is asking them to sign away. Health centre staff,
whose expertise is health care, not privacy law, may not understand the process
either.
"In a place like Nunavut, where educational levels are lower, where there
are language barriers, significant language barriers, they can't have even read
them in their own language," Keenan-Bengts said.
Ed Picco, Nunavut's health minister, slammed the consent form plan in a statement
this past May.
"The nurses and medical staff in Nunavut are trained and paid to deliver
medical services. It is inappropriate to ask them to become paper pushers generating
more federal red tape, or to create new barriers for Nunavummiut looking to
receive medical services," Picco said.
In its defence, Health Canada claims the consent forms are legal under the
federal Privacy Act. Health Canada also says that private insurance companies
commonly require clients to sign similar consent forms.
But Keenan-Bengts says she thinks that's a weak argument.
"You've got to look at the wording. What the Government of Canada is asking
aboriginal people to sign is a blanket consent. I haven't looked at the private
insurers' consent forms, but I suspect they're not that blanket. The consent
form issued by the federal government doesn't even limit the information to
medical purposes." she said.
As for the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, last March it issued a statement advising
Inuit not to sign the forms, and asking that information about the forms be
removed from public view.
ITK also said it was trying to work out an agreement with Health Canada to
protect Inuit health information.
But no such agreement has been reached, and Health Canada has rolled out the
program anyway, with a deadline of September 2003 for Nunavut.
|