August 22, 2003
Voltage-hungry Quebec makes Sanikiluaq uneasy
Nunavut under pressure
from fast-tracking of new hydro projects
JANE
GEORGE
Zach
Novalinga and other members of the Hamlet of Sanikiluaq's environment committee
made presentations at a consultation session in Montreal last May. (FILE PHOTO)
|
The people of Sanikiluaq
have reason to be uneasy.
They weren't affected by
last week's power outage, which threw Ontario and much of the eastern U.S. into
the dark.
But the blackout lent a
new urgency to hydroelectric developments in northern Quebec - projects that
directly affect Sanikiluaq.
Last Thursday, Quebec released
a document setting how environmental impact statements for the Eastmain-Rupert
hydroelectric project should be conducted.
The 70-page package of
directives left out any reference to Sanikiluaq and Nunavut, or to Inuit, although
this project will alter the flow of rivers that empty into James Bay and Hudson
Bay.
The $3.8-billion project,
part of the controversial James Bay power development plan, would generate 1,200
megawatts of electricity when it is completed in 10 years.
"Energy is very important
to us," said Quebec's premier Jean Charest shortly after the blackout -
a point he's bound to emphasize when he meets with Inuit leaders during a short
junket to Nunavik planned for next weekend.
As Quebec gears up to fast-track
hydroelectric development, this means the Government of Nunavut will look at
how it plans to honor its recent commitment to protect James Bay and Hudson
Bay.
Shortly after Cree and
Inuit signed deals with Quebec in the spring of 2002 that would pave the way
for new hydroelectric projects, Sanikiluaq, fearing the effects of more hydroelectric
development nearby, asked for the GN's help.
"All Nunavummiut have
a responsibility in protecting the environment that provides us with country
foods. In Sanikiluaq, that means protecting the surrounding waters and marine
mammals that provide physical and cultural sustenance," stated Premier
Paul Okalik in June, when he signed a memorandum of understanding with the mayor
of Sanikiluaq.
The agreement creates
a Nunavut-Hudson Bay working group. The GN has already given the group $55,000.
Brian Fleming, Sanikiluaq's
chief administrator, lobbied against the Great Whale hydroelectric project in
the 1990s.
Fleming said the need to
update aging electric infrastructure and meet increasing demands for power means
new hydro-projects affecting James Bay and Hudson Bay are more likely now then
they were 10 years ago.
"From our point of
view, we're not going to stand in the way of the rest of the population, but
if you're going to do it, do it right, get a monitoring system fixed up, and
in place so we can cope with it," Fleming said. "A lot is at stake."
Fleming said environmental
studies should look at entire scope and impact of any new projects that affect
watersheds, so that the James and Hudson bays don't end up with as many environmental
problems as the Great Lakes.
But time is short. Quebec's
desire to speed up new projects means that the environmental impact statements
on the Eastmain-Rupert project will be handed over next spring, followed by
public consultations later in 2004.
A final go-ahead order
for the project's start could be issued early in 2005.
When its two proponents,
the Société d'énergie de la Baie-James and Hydro-Québec,
complete their environmental impact studies, these will be submitted to a provincial
evaluation committee (COMEX), which has three representatives from Quebec and
two from the Cree Regional Authority.
COMEX will then hold a
round of public consultations with a federal review panel.
This federal body will
then carry out its own environmental analysis of the project, and make its recommendations
to the provincial administrator of the James Bay land claim agreement - which
happens to be the Quebec environment department.
The GN can make sure a
member of this committee is appointed from Nunavut to represent the interests
of Nunavut, Inuit, and the people of Sanikiluaq.
|