September 12, 2003
Northern premiers want involvement in missile defense
Premiers hope second
co-operation pact will avoid past failures
JANE GEORGE
Paul Okalik and Stephen Kakfwi at a press conference in Ottawa in February,
when the three territorial premiers joined forces to pry more health-care money
out of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien. (FILE PHOTO)
|
The three territorial premiers vowed to speak with a united voice on national
and international issues that affect Nunavut, Yukon and the Northwest Territories
last week in Cambridge Bay.
This means taking a stand on the U.S. scheme to ring the hemisphere's northern
perimeter with a national missile defense system capable of fighting off an
incoming attack.
The premiers said they must be involved in any security or defense negotiations
leading to the NMD, because their jurisdictions help assert Canada's sovereignty
in the Arctic.
"We know that we're in the northerly part of the North American continent.
Security and defense is a continuing issue, and we're on the front lines, but
we're also in the front lines of Canadian sovereignty," said Stephen Kakfwi,
premier of the Northwest Territories.
Yukon Premier Dennis Fentie and Nunavut Premier Paul Okalik echoed Kakfwi's
words. They said northern territories must not be "left in the dark."
"We've had discussions about cruise missiles, forward operating bases
and the DEW line since the '50s, '60s, '70s and '80s. The issue doesn't go away,"
Kakfwi said.
The territorial premiers have a long list of other items that they also plan
to fight for. Fueled by their success earlier this year in demanding - and receiving
- more federal money, some $60 million, for health care, the premiers see an
opening to, as Kakfwi said, "compel media and southern politicians to pay
attention."
"By working together we have made huge strides for our respective jurisdictions,"
Fentie said.
The premiers' shopping list includes the appointment of new Arctic ambassador
to replace Mary Simon, better revenue-sharing and funding formulas, and more
involvement in setting Canada's northern foreign policy, security and sovereignty
matters, resource development, and climate change strategies.
"If we are to survive we need to work together. This has characterized
our history for a long time and it's just as important and imperative as it
was 1,000 years ago," Kakfwi said.
But inter-territorial cooperation isn't as easy as the premiers seemed to imply
last week.
Only three years ago, shortly after Nunavut's creation in 1999, the three territorial
premiers made a similar pact to work together, also called the "Northern
Cooperation Accord."
This agreement, as even the premiers acknowledged last week, didn't add up
to much - except when they finally managed to put their heads together to seek
for more health care money this year.
In 1999, the premiers also said they would fight for more money: royalties
from non-renewable resource development in the North, more money to implement
self-government agreements, more money for infrastructure, seats on all major
national boards or committees, lower Nav Canada fees and stable postage rates
for food mail.
But Fentie said a change of government in Yukon after 1999 had fostered the
development of "an adversarial relationship" between the territories.
Okalik is the only signatory to the 1999 agreement still in office. He said
he was ready to forget the failure of that effort.
"It was unfortunate ... but relations weren't always very productive in
the past and we'll let bygones be bygones."
That said, the northern premiers committed to meeting once a year - and promised
results on the common issues facing their three territories.
"The challenge is how well we address them, and the key is working together
and working well together," Kakfwi said.
TOP
|