October 17, 2003
Candidates question ITK selection process
"It doesn't make
the organization very credible"
PATRICIA D'SOUZA
With only days remaining
before the 12 members of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami's annual general assembly gather
in Puvirnituq to select the organization's new president, candidates are coming
forward to publicly question a process that seems to have already determined
the incumbent, Jose Kusugak, to be the victor.
Pitseolak Pfeifer, one
of the six candidates vying against Kusugak for the president's seat, said that
despite numerous phone calls to the four members of ITK's board, the presidents
of the four Regional Inuit Associations, he has not had a single call returned.
"I've tried for months
to speak with all the directors and I've been unsuccessful in getting them to
return my calls. In that sense, being a candidate for this presidency has been
quite a challenge," said Pfeifer, an Ottawa-based communications consultant
and former ITK policy analyst.
"As far as having
access to the board of directors, it has been quite challenging. Politics is
not an easy game and this process has certainly demonstrated that."
Peter Ittinuar, another
candidate, said Kusugak is part of the problem. "I have nothing against
Jose Kusugak, but the process does seem to be quite contrived, and certainly,
Jose seems to be part and parcel of it. Whatever agreement they came to, it
seems to have settled the outcome before any real democratic process has taken
place," Ittinuar, a communications officer with Ontario's Native Affairs
Secretariat, said in an interview from his home in Brantford, Ont.
"I'm sure it doesn't
make the organization very credible, it doesn't make the incumbent very credible,
and it doesn't make the board of directors very credible."
Pfeifer, Ittinuar, as well
as John Amagoalik, a former president of the national Inuit organization who
is currently working as a consultant for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., are calling
on ITK to review the process of selecting a new president, or at least stop
calling the process an "election."
"The cancelled elections
in June and the off-again, on-again candidacy of job seekers has deeply injured
the credibility of ITK. The fact that only a handful of insiders and their chosen
few will elect a president makes it appear that an old boys' club rules ITK,"
Amagoalik said in a letter to Nunatsiaq News.
The last Arctic-wide election
was in May 1994, when Rosemarie Kuptana defeated Ruby Arngna'naaq, by only a
few hundred votes. Kuptana stepped down in April 1996, leaving the organization
with a deficit of more than $700,000. The board appointed Mary Sillett of Labrador
to serve the rest of Kuptana's term.
It was during that time
that the board changed the election procedures of ITK (then called Inuit Tapirisat
of Canada), to replace the universal election with the current process - election
by the four board members, plus two delegates from each region.
Robbie Watt, one of the
two candidates after the first call for nominations in May, suggested after
the June 12 election was cancelled and the nomination period extended that the
board revert to the Arctic-wide election system.
"Taking into consideration
that they did not follow their set policies and procedures in regards to the
nomination process, I felt that it would only be fair to reinstate the election
process that once existed within ITK, which is the universal election,"
Watt told Nunatsiaq News in June. He dropped out of the election this past fall.
But the remaining candidates
don't necessarily believe that a pan-Arctic election is the way to go, simply
because of the cost involved.
"We would have to
think of an election like the one the Assembly of First Nations does ... where
representatives from across the North are there and you have some fairness and
parity among all the regions that ITK represents," Ittinuar suggested.
Pfeifer recommended the
new president conduct a post-mortem after the election. "There are lessons
to be learned out of this process," he said.
He added, however, that
the current system has the potential to work. "In theory, the Inuit of
Canada are represented through the land claim presidents of each region. They're
elected by the people and therefore they have the authority to speak on behalf
of the people," he said.
But it's easy to see where
the perception of an old boys' club comes from. For instance, Kusugak was nominated
for re-election by Pita Aatami, president of Makivik Corp., one of the board
members of ITK and one of the 12 voting members of the assembly.
Still, some candidates,
like Ruby Arngna'naaq, who put in a strong showing during her last shot at the
presidency in 1994, truly believe they've got a chance against Kusugak.
"Of course, I'm just
as much an individual as he is. Just because he's current president, doesn't
mean he'll get a second seat. It doesn't necessarily mean that, look at the
last election.
In the last election, Kusugak
beat Okalik Eegesiak, who was seeking a second term after ousting Mary Sillett
from her seat in September 1997.
TOP
|