November 7, 2003
Nunavut decides against
same-sex marriage ceremonies
But courts could be
allowed to grant same-sex divorces
PATRICIA
D'SOUZA
Premier
Paul Okalik says that if Parliament and the Supreme Court change federal law
to allow same-sex marriages, then Nunavut will comply. (FILE PHOTO)
|
Nunavut will not perform
same-sex marriages unless compelled to do so by federal law, Premier Paul Okalik
said in the legislative assembly last week. However, he added, the territory
will recognize same-sex unions performed outside its boundaries.
"If developments in
the Parliament of Canada and the Supreme Court of Canada result in the definition
of marriage being broadened, we will respect the law and comply with that,"
he said in a minister's statement Oct. 31.
"In the meantime,
anyone in Nunavut who has been legally married anywhere will be recognized by
the Government of Nunavut as married."
That means same-sex couples
married in jurisdictions that allow such unions, and who move to Nunavut, would
theoretically be entitled to tax benefits as married couples, and may be able
to adopt children.
Furthermore, Nunavut's
court system could be called on to perform divorces and divide assets.
Okalik made the announcement
as part of a routine update on the federal legislation, and possibly also to
deflect questions regarding an Evaz Group contract in Rankin Inlet, which has
been the focus of question period for the past two weeks.
And, predictably, a number
of MLAs, and even cabinet ministers, rose in the House to take issue with the
GN's non-confrontational stand.
Manitok Thompson, the minister
of education, said during a member's statement that she suspected federal politicians
were being offered bribes to support the same-sex legislation.
"Mr. Speaker, I think
that at times, there are bribes for yes votes, to my knowledge," she said.
Uriash Puqiqnak, the MLA
for Nattilik, rose this past Monday to tell his fellow members in an impassioned
member's statement that there was no homosexuality among early Inuit.
"We would go hunting,
male to male, and we didn't think about anything else except hunting."
Puqiqnak embraced Rankin
Inlet North MLA Jack Anawak, his neighbour in the House, as a sign of friendship
- emphasizing it was not a sign of romantic interest.
"I feel we don't have
to agree with the people who are telling us to OK the legislation," he
said.
But the federal legislation
does not require the GN's consent. If the Supreme Court of Canada finds that
the existing definition of marriage - a union between a man and a woman - violates
equality rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Nunavut and all other
jurisdictions in Canada will be bound by its ruling.
Still, many Nunavut MLAs
believe the GN should be fighting the proposed legislation as it has opposed
the federal gun legislation.
"Will the Premier
be lobbying the federal government on that act? Which one is he going to support
- Inuit people or the federal government?" asked Patterk Netser, MLA for
Nanulik.
But the gun legislation
is in conflict with the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement, which says Inuit do not
require a licence to hunt. And in creating obstacles to lawful hunting among
Inuit, the federal gun legislation could threaten a traditional livelihood.
The same-sex marriage legislation,
however, does not affect Inuit traditional rights, and does not create any economic
obstacles to survival.
"The federal gun legislation
affects the rights of Inuit - that's why we challenged it," Okalik said.
"We have to represent our people. That's why we don't want to support same-sex
marriage at this time."
The fear of Nunavummiut,
which seems to be reflected in their MLAs, is that permitting marriage between
gay couples will allow such relationships to thrive. And in Nunavut, that seems
to be the same as threatening Inuit survival.
"Inuit had to survive
all on their own and they tried to have morals. If the morals break down somewhere,
the people might starve," said Quttiktuq MLA Rebekah Williams, in trying
to explain why Inuit seem to be so opposed to gay rights.
"It's something new,"
she said.
The issue is an important
one for Williams, who has decided to listen to the residents of her three High
Arctic communities - and oppose same-sex marriage - even though her more progressive
personal beliefs are pulling her the other way.
"This is my work.
I have tasks to do and I will boldly, with courage, bring forward my constituents'
concerns and wishes," she said.
However, like Okalik, she
said she will obey the ruling of the Supreme Court. But if Nunavummiut are to
follow, she added, there must be public education.
"We need to let people
know fully, without emotions, that this is the law," she said.
"Like the Premier
said, we're Canadians. We're part of Canada."
TOP
|