November 14, 2003
City of Iqaluit fails safety standards
City lacking in worker
training, investigating accidents
GREG
YOUNGER-LEWIS
City councillors in Iqaluit don't always get to see what the city pays for.
Nunatsiaq News has learned that council approved funding this summer for an
audit of the municipality's hot-button issue of health and safety. As it turns
out, until now, only city administrators would see that the city had failed
to meet safety standards set by the Workers' Compensation Board.
Past council members, who were grappling with public backlash over pedestrians
being killed by city vehicles, never saw the city's first occupational health
and safety audit, done in early July. The audit showed where the municipality
was failing to follow health and safety procedures, and how it could improve.
The audit gave the city a failing grade in three areas, including training
workers, investigating accidents, and providing adequate hazard control, such
as monitoring whether workers are exposed to dangerous chemicals. In light of
the poor grades, the auditor recommended the city immediately begin formal training
of the safe operation and inspection of all equipment, particularly city vehicles.
The auditor, a Toronto consultant who specializes in health and safety audits,
also urged the city to begin training employees immediately on how to investigate
all accidents, whether minor or fatal.
While the auditor said in an interview that he found workers who had the training
to investigate workplace and work-related accidents, he said a communication
breakdown between personnel and management led administration to believe they
had no one qualified to do so.
Until last month, city officials said they didn't have someone trained to investigate
accidents. Consequently, the city did not review, or at least did not document,
what safety procedures may have been violated in the three fatal accidents involving
municipal vehicles over the past three years.
City administration said the audit has prompted several improvements, including
a training session in October on accident investigation.
Administration said it also funded an air-brakes and level-three driving course
and test. The city's health and safety committee, a group of municipal administrators,
staff and public works foremen, are also working on an orientation package for
new employees. The audit had criticized the city for having no formal orientation
up until July.
Lack of documentation was one of the city's largest faults in the audit. Nearly
every low score is followed by comments about the need to write down what safety
procedures are being followed. The report notes that workplace inspections are
informal, and not documented; the city is missing documentation on equipment
procedures; there is no written proof of training; and there is no measure of
how effective the training is.
The audit also points out that supervisors were not writing down regular equipment
inspections, and that they lacked training in safety issues.
Moreover, the report indicated that some workers were not familiar with the
city's safety policy. According to their former director, public works employees
have yet to receive a form clarifying their overall responsibilities in health
and safety.
As for bad marks given for the absence of documentation in public works, former
director Jim Grittner said he was to blame.
Grittner said a lot of safety procedures, including documentation, changed
after the fatal accident in April when four-year-old Sheila Mathewsie was hit
and killed by a sewage truck.
"Drivers weren't challenged every day [to turn in their vehicle inspection
reports]," said Grittner, who was fired this month. "Now they're being
challenged. Now you're not supposed to be driving until it's handed in."
Since the accident, Grittner said mechanics must tune up tires and brakes on
every city vehicle, every week.
Grittner encouraged the city to take its poor showing in the audit as further
reason to hire a full-time health and safety officer.
"In this world of safety and lawsuits, you have to have one," he
said.
Despite the city's obvious shortcomings, the report's author said the public
shouldn't be overly concerned about the results.
Tim Favery, a health and safety consultant with Dillon Consulting, said he
was concerned that his work would be misinterpreted.
"If someone wasn't clear on what the intent of an audit tool like this
is, they could interpret it as 'the city is ... unsafe, is the worst place to
work, it's breaking the law,'" Favery said. "Now if I was to go back
and do the same audit, it could have totally different scores because the city
may have done things."
One former councillor suggested the audit should have been made public sooner
to help the city improve its safety record.
Former councillor Keith Irving warned the incoming council that it should be
vigilant in ensuring that it gets to see any reports it approves.
"For council to make decisions about public safety, [they] need to know
where problems are," he said. "For me, to hear about this after we
leave is a major concern."
Administration said it decided not to share the audit with the past council
because of the timing of the election.
Chief Administrative Officer Ian Fremantle said work still remained to be done
on the audit's recommendations, and couldn't be fully implementing until current
restructuring was finished. This refers, in part, to the firing of former public
works director Jim Grittner, and future hiring of someone to oversee safety
issues within the city.
"In actual fact, administration has formalized a plan on how to put [the
audit recommendations] in place," Fremantle said. "There are still
some issues to be dealt with and when all the restructuring has been done, I'll
be happy to talk about it."
TOP
|