February 13, 2004
Auditor-general slams
DIAND on land claims record
Department has never
set performance goals for itself
JIM
BELL
NTI's
chief operating officer, Richard Paton: "The department has not done what
any well-run government or business would have done." (PHOTO BY PATRICA
D'SOUZA)
|
Sheila Fraser, the auditor
general of Canada, slammed the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs in
her latest report this week, saying DIAND doesn't even know if it's meeting
the goals of the Nunavut land claims agreement.
Officials with Nunavut
Tungavik Inc. reacted to Fraser's findings immediately, saying she confirms
what they've been saying about DIAND for at least two years.
"It should come as
no surprise to Inuit, or to Canadian taxpayers, that DIAND received a failing
grade in Ms. Fraser's assessment. The department has not done what any well-run
government or business would have done in managing a complex process like implementing
a major land claims agreement," Richard Paton, NTI's chief operating officer,
said at a press conference in Iqaluit this week.
Fraser's report found that
in carrying out its land claim responsibilities, DIAND has set no measurable
performance goals for itself. That, she said, makes it virtually impossible
for Parliament, or the public, to make the department accountable for its work.
DIAND's annual reports
on land claim implementation don't contain enough information and "are
not helpful in holding the federal government accountable."
She found DIAND doesn't
even know the actual cost of implementing the Nunavut and Gwich'in land claim
agreements, whether those costs are incurred by DIAND, or other government departments
"We were unable to
find any such financial reporting for either of the agreements, nor were we
able to find any process to capture financial information for management purposes,"
Fraser said.
Another area of serious
dysfunction is in dispute resolution. Fraser found that the Nunavut arbitration
panel - which is supposed to resolve land claim implementation disputes between
NTI and the federal government - has not reviewed any disputes.
And it's in spite of at
least two serious, longstanding disputes between NTI and DIAND over Inuit employment
and training in government (Article 23), and Inuit access to federal government
contracts (Article 24).
For nearly two years, NTI
has been attempting to negotiate a new deal on Article 23, as part of the second,
10-year implementation plan for the Nunavut land claims agreement.
But Ottawa has dug in its
heels over an NTI demand for millions of new dollars a year for adult job training
and post-secondary education.
John Lamb, NTI's chief
executive officer, said the organization is looking for a complete change of
attitude at DIAND. That change would move the department from a narrow, legalistic
approach to its land claims responsibilities toward a recognition that the spirit
of the agreement must also be observed.
"We are looking for
a change at DIAND," Lamb said, saying the throne speech, the appointment
of a new DIAND minister, and now the auditor general's report, give NTI more
hope than ever before.
Fraser's analysis of DIAND's
work in implementing the Nunavut and Gwich'in land claim agreements is contained
in Chapter 8 of her latest report, which has other chapters devoted to the well-publicized
scandal involving the Department of Public Works and $100 million worth of federal
advertising money that was misused.
Though her report
was finished last November, it couldn't be made public until after the House
of Commons resumed this month.
TOP
|