July 2, 2004
Book Review: Uqalurait
Oral history of Nunavut
requires some refinement
SARA MINOGUE
More than 50 people packed into the Unikkaarvik Visitor Centre in Iqaluit on
June 16 for the launch of a thick new book that compiles material from interviews
with elders across the territory.
Forty of those people took home a copy of Uqalurait: An Oral History of Nunavut,
but most will be disappointed when they start reading.
What could have been a portable archive of elders knowledge and history
is, instead, 473 pages of study notes for a book that never materialized.
The idea for Uqalurait emerged in 1993 when David Webster, then working at
Parks Canadas National Historic Sites Directorate, was asked to produce
background material that would help the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of
Canada decide which of several proposed sites in Nunavut should be labeled historic,
and thus, protected.
He saw an opportunity to collect a large amount of oral history that would
help the Historic Sites and Monuments board, as well as preserve and share knowledge
that was largely undocumented.
By December of that year, Webster had formed a committee of Inuit from across
the territory, including David Serkoak, Peter Irniq, Suzanne Evaloardjuk and
Uriash Puqiqnak. John Maksagak and Geela Giroux were also part of the committee,
but died in 1998 and 2000, respectively.
Two writer/researchers were invited: John Bennett, former editor of Inuktitut
magazine, and Susan Rowley, an assistant professor of anthropology and sociology
at the University of British Columbia.
The committee spent five years collecting the raw material for the book. Some
material came from new interviews with elders, but much of it was culled from
other sources, such as the Igloolik Oral History Project. Elders are even quoted
from the journals of Arctic explorer Knud Rassmussen, which date back to the
1920s.
It took another five years to find the elders, or their family members, to
get permission to use interview material that was, in some cases, over 80 years
old.
Anticipation over the books publication was again evident when Arctic
Ventures held a book signing the day after the official launch. Staff piled
the books high on the display table, expecting to sell dozens of
copies.
The book itself is appealing. It opens with 14 colourful pages of paintings
and drawings about traditional Inuit life. Numerous historic photographs appear
throughout the text. There are some illustrations, and a few maps.
Inside, however, readers will be confused almost from the beginning.
Traditional oral history uses stories to describe the past. In this book, the
authors culled the transcripts for facts, and organized the book accordingly,
so that a moving story about an elder who sacrifices himself for his family
appears in chapter called Food Sharing, rather than Family.
Great hunting adventures are divided equally between the chapters called Animals
and Hunting.
Elders are supposed to tell the history, and as many as possible are quoted
on any given theme, in statements that are not always illuminating. In some
cases, long, lively, memorable stories are recounted, but in many cases, the
quotes are single sentences that add little context.
If the goal was to preserve the words of individual speakers, this is not made
evident to readers. All of the quotes are attributed, with their name and region,
but instead of including the date of the interview, or listing who they spoke
with, the editors chose a complex system of acronyms, explained in a one page
index in the back, to denote the source of the interview.
The oral history is interspersed with commentary from the authors,
which is often repetitive or unnecessary.
Naturally, there is much overlap between themes. Instead of confronting this
challenge, the authors choose in some cases to quote the same speaker, using
the same statement, more than once.
On some pages, there are actual errors, such as parts of sentences whole
paragraphs? that are missing.
At 473 pages, the book is unlikely to appeal to the audience its authors say
theyre aiming for: children, young parents, and teachers of Nunavut. It
is more likely to attract academics, who should be its secondary audience.
Uqalurait is still a massive accomplishment.
Patient readers will find some lively stories, like the juicy tale about a
woman who plots with another man to kill her husband, or the hunter who died
gripping a walrus tusk while trying to prove he could win the hunt alone.
No one would refute the idea that Nunavut needs to hang onto the history that
its elders can only safeguard temporarily, and any publication that gets near
that goal should be celebrated.
Its to be hoped that in this case, the achievement will inspire someone
else to produce a book that people want to read late into the night, and maybe
pass on to someone else.
TOP
|