July 23, 2004
Ratepayers fear property tax increases
Council urged to seek
other ways to ease budget problems
GREG YOUNGER-LEWIS
Fed up with the lack of money to pave Iqaluit's dilapidated roads, ratepayers
are demanding the imposition of a vehicle tax. (FILE PHOTO)
|
Iqaluit's struggle to improve roads, sewage pipes and other infrastructure
has provoked homeowners to issue renewed calls for a tax on drivers, to help
offset city hall's rising expenses.
Many ratepayers hope such a move would help avoid further tax hikes on property
owners, and share the growing burden they carry in funding municipal services,
from future walkways to a currently troubled paving plan.
Larry Simpson, a homeowner for 20 years in Iqaluit, warned council not to ask
ratepayers to pitch in more money through increased taxes, or to approve more
borrowing to solve the current cash crunch.
Simpson said councillors need to honour a promise from John Matthews, the former
mayor, that they would put a user-fee system in place. The proposed changes
would force residents who don't own property to chip in an amount of tax that
reflects how much they use municipal infrastructure, like roads.
"There was a gentleman's agreement there, that future tax increases...
would be more equitable," Simpson said. "Don't always come back and
dump it on the ratepayers. We're only a small population here."
Other ratepayers echoed Simpson in their reaction to news that Iqaluit council
has abandoned its original plan to infuse $51 million in repairs and upgrades
to the community's crumbling infrastructure. Council shares the overall budget
for the plan with the government of Nunavut.
Council will study its budget in the coming months to find ways of closing
the gap between revenue and expenses, after learning that millions of dollars
in reserves have dried up years earlier than planned. Council is also grappling
with a decline in development that they expected to bring in much-needed taxes.
As a result, the city lacks about $10 million in funds required for capital
plan commitments.
Some ratepayers suggest that the city's cited reasons for the shortfalls don't
add up.
Kowesa Etitiq, an Iqaluit homeowner of two years, said council should order
an independent review of the finance department and other administrators, similar
to a full review done two years ago on a dysfunctional public works department.
"The City's screwups are always having to be paid for by the homeowners,"
Etitiq said. "I think it's time to look at the advice these folks are giving.
Is it the right advice?"
Etitiq supported levying a gas tax or road use fee on drivers, but also wanted
to see the City change its approach to road repairs.
He noted that contractors have repaved the same roads in Iqaluit several times,
while neglecting to tend to other streets. Etitiq said council could save money
by hiring a new company to do the work, because the contractor, Baffin Building
Systems, is "obviously not doing a good job."
Susan Gardener, a long-time homeowner, also appealed to council to start sharing
more of the expenses with non-homeowners, such as taxi drivers.
Gardener, who chairs the Iqaluit Housing Authority board, said taxi drivers
usually don't own homes, but use the streets more than anyone else.
With an estimated 300 new vehicles entering Iqaluit every year, Gardener said
city hall shouldn't wait to slap a tax on all vehicle owners.
"The homeowners are being depended on for so much when it comes to the
maintenance of roads," she said. "It [a vehicle tax] is another way
of bringing in money."
Mayor Elisapee Sheutiapik said city administration made the right decision
in lobbying to put the original capital plan on hold, because costs were getting
too high.
Besides a shortage of development dollars, Sheutiapik and other council members
blame unexpected expenses like repairs on the new arena, and pricey contracts,
like sewage system upgrades, for the budget shortfalls.
Administration has repeatedly blamed the city's household recycling program
for draining resources. Last month, council considered cutting the program,
which costs about $250,000, but which was budgeted to receive just $5,000 this
year.
"I think it's normal practice," Sheutiapik said of council reviewing
their plans for infrastructure upgrades. "We want to make sure that we're
making informed decisions.
"We're more proactive. I think that something that taxpayers have to remember,
is that this is a process to ensure that we are [using] due diligence."
TOP
|