August 27, 2004
First Air sues over 2001 hangar fire
City of Iqaluit defends
firefighter's response
GREG
YOUNGER-LEWIS
CLICK
PHOTO TO ENLARGE
First
Air alleges that BBS, and as many as four governments, may have committed acts
of negligence that led to this fire on May 27, 2001 that destroyed the airline's
only maintenance hangar in Nunavut. (FILE PHOTO)
|
First Air, the Arctic's
largest airline, has launched a lawsuit against Baffin Building Systems, the
City of Iqaluit, the Government of Nunavut, the Government of the Northwest
Territories, and the Government of Canada, claiming financial compensation for
a fire that destroyed a First Air maintenance hangar in Nunavut's capital three
years ago.
First Air lost the entire
hangar on May 27, 2001, when it was consumed by a fire. The 12,000-square-foot
building at Iqaluit's airport was the airline's only maintenance hangar in Nunavut.
Their statement of claim
does not specify how much money First Air would seek in damages if its allegations
are proven to be true.
In its lawsuit, First Air
accuses one of Iqaluit's largest contractors, BBS, of improperly installing
a drain beneath the hangar, which the airline says contributed to the fire.
First Air alleges that
BBS designed and installed a drain to collect any flammable liquids that spilled
during airplane maintenance seven years ago when the hangar was built.
In its statement of defence,
BBS confirms it installed the controversial drain, but said another company
designed it and that they did the work according to First Air's instructions.
The airline also alleges
that BBS failed to follow fire and building codes, partly by wrapping flammable
insulation around an electronic device called a heat-trace system, the same
type of building defect blamed for starting a fire that consumed Joamie School
last year.
In their statement of defence,
filed in April this year, BBS rejects all of First Air's claims.
BBS said in its defence
that the airline is to blame because they failed to control where employees
were throwing cigarette butts, which BBS says may have started the massive fire.
According to BBS, First
Air knew its employees were throwing cigarette butts down a drainpipe that lead
to an area underneath the floor where the airline said the fire originated.
BBS said First Air staff
had even put out a fire with a bucket of water in the area before the larger
fire occurred. First Air knew or ought to have known this would cause a fire,
the BBS defence statement says.
BBS claims that if a judge
ever finds there was negligence that caused the fire that burned down the hangar,
the blame lies either with First Air, or the governments that the airline is
suing.
The City of Iqaluit's statement
of defence denies any wrong-doing or negligence in the fire, and says that if
a judge finds any government owes First Air for their losses, it should be the
Government of Nunavut, which controls the airport land where the fire took place.
The City states that its
firefighters are not obligated to put out fires on airport lands.
However, despite claiming
the fire was outside its jurisdiction, the City goes on to defend its fire department's
abilities to battle a fire.
First Air accuses Iqaluit's
fire department of suffering a communication breakdown while their hangar burned
down, and further claims that firefighters lacked enough water pressure to do
their job.
Iqaluit's counter-claim
states that by the time the firefighters got to the scene of the fire, the hangar
was "largely engulfed in flames and heavy thick black smoke was spewing
from the structure."
The statement of defence
admits there were problems accessing water at the time, because there was no
fire hydrant at the site, and the closest one was locked behind an airport gate.
But even if their firefighters lacked enough water pressure, the City says it's
not responsible for putting out "such a large industrial structural fire
on Airport lands."
As for communication problems,
Iqaluit's lawyer writes that there were no problems, as Iqaluit firefighters
spoke directly with airport firefighters by walkie-talkie or face-to-face.
The governments of Canada,
Nunavut and the Northwest Territories also reject the airline's claims.
Each government denies
responsibility for any negligence that may have led to the installation of the
problem drainpipe, and the subsequent fire.
In fact, in its statement
of defence, the GNWT lists several reasons why First Air is to blame for its
own loss. These include First Air's alleged failure to supervise BBS's installation
of the controversial drain, and ensure that it met safety requirements.
The federal government,
also named in the suit, responded to First Air's claims, by saying they handed
over the airport land to the GNWT two years before the fire occurred. Therefore,
it said the federal government had nothing to do with ensuring the hangar's
drainage system was safe.
Fire Marshal Gerald Pickett
has written a report on the causes of the fire, but has refused to release it,
citing legal constraints.
TOP
|