April 1, 2005
Heat's on Nunavut
MP for dog inquiry
"She has to support
us. We're talking about our people, her people"
GREG
YOUNGER-LEWIS
Nancy
Karetak-Lindell, Liberal MP for Nunavut, questions whether a judicial inquiry
is the best way for Inuit to get answers about the dog killings. (FILE PHOTO)
|
Nunavut's Liberal MP faces
mounting pressure to convince the federal government to launch an inquiry into
why police killed a massive number of Inuit sled dogs throughout the Arctic
decades ago.
Nancy Karetak-Lindell,
a back-bencher with the Liberal party for eight years, promised in a recent
interview to keep reminding her colleagues in caucus about the Inuit demand
for an inquiry.
But she declined to act
as a champion of the cause.
"I think the matter
should be addressed," Karetak-Lindell said last week. "I don't know
if [the inquiry] is the right way to go about it."
Karetak-Lindell was in
an awkward spot last month, when Parliament's standing committee on aboriginal
affairs and northern development met with Inuit elders and political leaders.
The group told committee
MPs about how police shot thousands of Inuit dogs from the 1950s to the 1970s.
Inuit leaders suspect the
RCMP in the Arctic and provincial police in northern Quebec were acting on orders
to force Inuit to stay in settlements by removing their only means of travel.
Police argue they were
protecting the communities because the dogs were diseased and dangerous.
Karetak-Lindell sympathized
with the elders' stories, saying they deserved to know the truth about the killings.
But after their testimony,
it was six opposition MPs on the committee, not Karetak-Lindell's fellow Liberals,
who endorsed a motion demanding the government appoint a superior court judge
to investigate the group's claims.
Four Liberals on the committee
voted against the motion, citing procedural concerns about whether another committee
should be dealing with the matter. Karetak-Lindell didn't vote because she chairs
the committee.
In parliamentary tradition,
a committee chair remains neutral, unless she has to break a tie in voting.
Karetak-Lindell insists
she doesn't oppose having a judicial inquiry. Only, she questions whether Inuit
should look for another way of getting answers.
She didn't have other suggestions
about how to investigate the dog killings.
"I'm in a difficult
position," she said. "I'm chair of the committee and I try to be impartial.
As a member for Nunavut, I want to make sure their message is getting through.
"If they feel they
want a judicial inquiry... then that's the message I'm going to give."
Karetak-Lindell is quick
to point out that she saw the pain that the dog killings inflicted on her neighbours
while she was growing up in Arviat in the 1960s.
Karetak-Lindell, 47, grew
up with the RCMP, and sometimes acted as an unofficial translator between officers
and unilingual Inuit. Her father was a police officer, and likely saw his colleagues
shoot dog teams, ostensibly because they were sick with a canine disease called
distemper.
Inuit leaders are disappointed
Karetak-Lindell isn't more supportive of their demands, considering her roots.
"She's voted MP of
Nunavut," said Thomasie Alikatuktuk, president of the Qikiqtani Inuit Assocation.
"She has to support us. We're talking about our people, her people. And
my people really want an inquiry."
The demand now sits in
the government's hands, without a legal obligation to act on it.
However, Bernard Cleary,
the Bloc Québécois MP leading the push for an inquiry, said the
Liberals have no choice.
Cleary said if the government
fails to set up a judicial inquiry by April 15, the opposition will create a
political crisis.
"They're a minority,"
Cleary said in French. "That means they can't reverse the decision. They
have the right to reject it, but they'll have to pay the price it brings."
The Liberals may have already
got the message. Nunavut MLAs passed a unanimous motion last month calling on
the federal government to meet Inuit demands.
Plus, rumours are swirling
around Parliament Hill that Anne McLellan, the minister responsible for the
RCMP, has starting looking for a judge to head the inquiry.
Guy St-Julien, the recently
defeated MP for Nunavik, now lobbies his former Liberal colleagues in cabinet
on behalf of Makivik Corp., which spearheaded the campaign for an inquiry.
St-Julien said he met with
the prime minister and several cabinet ministers last week to pass on the Inuit
demands.
"The big victory is
coming," St-Julien said coyly in French. "But it still needs to be
won."
If the government agrees
to the inquiry, St-Julien said the judge will release a report on the dog killings
by July.
TOP
|