April 8, 2005
Fired GN worker calls
on Human Rights Commission
Harbir Boparai seeks
compensation, apology for racist treatment
GREG
YOUNGER-LEWIS
Harbir Boparai, the government
of Nunavut employee who was fired three weeks after being hired in Pangnirtung
last summer, has raised the stakes in his battle for compensation by calling
on the Canadian Human Rights Commission to review his case.
Boparai's dismissal came
after senior bureaucrats and staff in the premier's office accepted racist rumours
about his getting his job through another South Asian in Pangnirtung last summer.
Government documents show
Rosemary Keenainak, a GN deputy minister, ordered his firing, even after his
supervisor said that the rumours were untrue and Boparai had the skills for
the job.
The Nunavut Employees Union
is representing Boparai in his grievance against the government, claiming he
was wrongfully dismissed.
Boparai says his complaint
with the human rights commission will serve as a back-up means to resolve the
dispute, in case negotiations break down between the GN and the union.
Government and union officials
met to discuss the case last month, but fell short of a deal.
"The government of
Nunavut doesn't take me seriously at all," Boparai said from his home in
Vancouver.
"I feel they don't
admit their mistakes and they don't want to learn from them."
Boparai is demanding an
apology from the premier and financial compensation for lost wages. While he
wouldn't disclose the amount of money he wants, Boparai promised to donate some
of it to an Inuit charity based in Nunavut.
However, the recent meeting
failed, Boparai said, because government leaders hope he'll eventually lose
interest in pursuing the matter.
Boparai confirmed the government
is also rejecting one of his key demands - to fire Keenainak.
He said government officials
are protecting Keenainak because she's part of Nunavut's political elite.
Keenainak, deputy minister
of economic development and transportation, has strong ties to Premier Paul
Okalik.
Keenainak's e-mails to
the premier's office staff indicate the firing took place after Okalik was visiting
Pangnirtung and heard about the rumours.
The gossip attracted the
attention of senior bureaucrats after they received an e-mail sent by another
GN worker, James Cummings, the husband of one of Boparai's colleagues. In the
note, he warns that Pangnirtung residents were upset about Boparai's hiring,
because they had heard he got his job through his roommate, who also worked
for the government.
Cummings suggested the
roommate was actually Boparai's brother-in-law, even though the two are not
related.
Peter Ma, then principal
secretary to the premier, exchanged notes with Keenainak to express concern
about the rumours, and within 10 days, Boparai was dismissed.
In her correspondence,
Keenainak claimed she fired Boparai because Inuit weren't given a chance to
apply for the casual position, which involved researching the creation of a
bank or credit union for Nunavut.
But after re-opening the
position, government bosses hired another non-Inuk to take Boparai's place.
Boparai, a 23-year-old
university graduate in economics, believes his replacement shows that increasing
Inuit employment wasn't the motivation behind his firing.
"I was fired in the
name of Inuit employment, but they didn't hire an Inuit," he said. "Why
did they fire me in the first place if they weren't going to hire an Inuit?
"All [Okalik]'s done
is alter the public perception. I guess that's the flaw in so many politicians.
They're not working for the people. They're working for the people's vote."
Doug Workman, NEU president,
said he was optimistic that the grievance would be resolved in Boparai's favour
by the end of the year.
But Workman cautioned that
the dispute would probably require a full arbitration process. Then, they'll
face the challenge of agreeing which arbitrator should oversee the proceedings.
"The number one thing
is to get it resolved sooner than later," Workman said.
Officials with the GN said
they can't comment on Boparai's case until the grievance process is over, because
they consider it a personnel matter.
The Canadian Human Rights
Commission representatives also won't comment on the case. However, a spokesman
for the commission said it takes about a year to complete their review of any
complaint that they decide to investigate.
TOP
|