July 8, 2005
NTI, GN battle over wolverine and grizzly quotas
NTI
doesn't like proposed new hunting limits in Wildlife Act regulations
GREG YOUNGER-LEWIS
Members of the NWMB heard from federal officials last month that they would
not put Nunavut's wolverine and grizzly on the endangered species list. (PHOTO
BY GREG YOUNGER-LEWIS)
|
The government of Nunavut's push to limit the hunt of grizzly bear and wolverine
is sending the GN towards another clash over their proposed hunting regulations.
Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. wildlife representatives say they are trying to put
more control over wildlife management into the hands of the communities, as
they continue meeting with the GN over new proposed hunting rules for the territory.
But according to NTI, the GN is working against this approach to wildlife management,
because the government intends to push for precise quotas on several species
- without consulting with the communities.
Gabriel Nirlungayuk, director of wildlife for NTI, is worried that presetting
limits in the regulations will mean hunters will have less influence over the
harvest of grizzly bear and wolverine.
"We feel they don't have the authority to do that," Nirlungayuk said.
"We never gave up that right."
Despite opposition from NTI, the government has included total allowable harvest
orders, or quotas, on grizzly bear and wolverine in a proposed set of wildlife
regulations, currently to be reviewed by hunters and trappers organizations.
NTI has already won two battles with the GN over proposed wildlife regulations.
First, they convinced the government to slow the consultation process, to finish
their Inuktitut draft, and to give hunters more time to review their proposals.
Later, the government answered NTI's call to leave caribou hunting regulations
for non-Inuit as five caribou per year. Originally, the GN wanted to let non-Inuit
possess five caribou at any given time.
With wolverine and grizzly bear, Nirlungayuk feels the GN has overstepped their
defined powers under section 24 of the Nunavut Act. He said the act allows the
GN to regulate the Inuit harvest of polar bear and muskox, and sport hunting
of other animals.
But the act doesn't mention subsistence hunting of grizzly bear and wolverine,
Nirlungayuk says, and therefore, the government shouldn't be managing the hunt.
The animals are mainly found in the Kitikmeot and Kivalliq regions. The wolverine
pelts are coveted by hunters in communities like Cambridge Bay, Kugluktuk, Baker
Lake and Arviat. The fur is often used in parka trim.
"They're becoming more and more valuable to the communities," said
Jim Noble, CEO of the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board. "Their value is
getting high."
Grizzly bear pelts and meat are generally less popular, he said.
Noble said the federal government was the first to press hunters to manage
these species in Nunavut. Populations for the two species are thinning, or completely
gone, in regions of southern Canada.
However, officials from Environment Canada won't be listing Nunavut's populations
of wolverine and grizzly bear as a species of concern, according to minutes
from the NWMB's board meeting last month.
In a recent interview with Nunatsiaq News, Trevor Swerdfager, director-general
of the Canadian Wildlife Service, said they backed off the listing, specifically
because the concerns they heard during consultations with groups in Nunavut.
Community representatives said more research needs to be done on the bears
and wolverine in Nunavut, as the territory lacks recent population estimates
on the species.
However, GN officials said they have up-to-date surveys of the two populations.
Steve Pinksen, director of policy planning and legislation for the GN's department
of environment, said he had a "substantive body of research" on the
two species in Nunavut.
However, Pinksen said hunters would receive a new set of proposed hunting regulations
in the fall, adding that the GN's suggested quota for species "won't necessarily"
be in the final drafted rules.
"It's all subject to revision," Pinksen said. "There's nothing
in there that's been approved at any level.
"We will have to be making final adjustments."
TOP
|