February 8, 2002
Judge stops trial to acquit
man of sex charges
Following an Inuit sexual
assault complainants testimony, Judge Louis Du Blois dismisses jury and
sets her alleged assailant free
JANE
GEORGE
KUUJJUAQ A Kuujjuaq
man accused of sexual assault was found not guilty last week even before
a jury had a chance to consider the evidence against him.
During his years as a judge
in Quebecs superior court, Louis Du Blois had never before called for
a "directed verdict" until last week.
Thats when he told
the jury that Jimmy Emak, 40, a Kangiqsualujjuaq resident charged with sexual
assaulting a 40-year-old Kangiqsualujjuaq woman, had to be acquitted.
"No jury could find
Mr. Emak guilty on the evidence presented in front of the jury," Du Blois
told the court last week.
The official verdict would
be "not guilty," Du Blois said.
Only very rarely will any
judge decide to dismiss a jury before its members can render a verdict.
Du Bloiss "directed
verdict" was the first in Nunavik.
Before a case goes to trial,
the Crown prosecutor is supposed to ensure that evidence against accused persons
is strong enough to justify prosecuting them. After that, a preliminary inquiry
is supposed to determine if there is enough evidence to justify holding a trial.
But Judge Du Blois eventually
determined that there was an "absence of ingredients" of evidence
and no reason to continue the trial.
At 9 a.m. on the day of
the trial, jury members arrived at the Kuujjuaq courthouse to hear Emaks
case. Emak had elected to be tried by judge and jury.
The woman had accused Emak
of sexually assaulting her in her home on April 22, 1999.
She said in court that
when Emak knocked on her apartment door she let him in, thinking he was her
drunken brother. She said he then chased her into the bedroom, took off her
clothes and sexually assaulted her.
Angered by comments he
made to her about wanting to have sex with her daughter to make her pregnant,
the woman said she became angry and stabbed him with a knife.
Later, she went to the
police to make a complaint against Emak.
These elements of her story
didnt change during her testimony. But many other details did, especially
the sequence of events.
She gave varying times
for when the accused entered her house, how long he stayed, and whether they
had sex again, later.
Speaking slowly, the woman
needed prodding and explanation from interpreters in order to answer lawyers
questions.
The repeated questioning
appeared to intimidate the woman, who stood stiffly in front of the court. As
the questioning proceeded, the woman, whose palms were visibly sweating, became
even more uncertain of her testimony.
When defense lawyer Jacques
Stuart challenged her on her memory of the events, the woman said that perhaps
she was still sleepy. She said she had woken up at 8 a.m., shortly before her
court appearance.
The alleged victim didnt
mention several details of evidence that had appeared on the police report she
signed, including a claim that her assailant had bitten her on the shoulder
and breast.
She did, however, spontaneously
introduce other details, which the court didnt quite know how to handle.
The woman said after they
had had sex, Emak accused her of taking some hash he was selling. Angered by
this alleged theft, he had threatened to report her stabbing him to the police.
During the preliminary
inquiry into the charge against Emak, this turn of events had never been mentioned.
The fly-in prosecutor,
Richard Duchesneau, was new to the case. He inherited it from Louis-Christian
Boisvert, who was badly injured earlier this month in a snowmobile mishap.
Duchesneau appeared to
be caught off-guard by the numerous inconsistencies and contradictions in the
complainant story.
The many differences between
her testimony and the police report on the alleged incident appeared to dismay
Capt. Carl Pépin of the Kativik Regional Police Force.
The two-day trial, which
according to one court worker cost about $50,000, was over in three hours.
The 12 jurors, six men
and six women a cross-section of Kuujjuaqs upstanding citizens
received the news of their early dismissal with amazement, then smiles.
"I hope you enjoyed
the short time of duty you had," Du Blois told the jury.
When the trial began, Emak
showed little emotion, but after the jurys dismissal, when he was free
to leave, Emak happily shook hands with his lawyer.
|