|
June 14, 2002
Crown drops child-porn
charge against former RCMP member
Stay of proceeding means
case may be re-opened
KIRSTEN
MURPHY
A single charge of possession
of child pornography against former RCMP Cpl. Paul Richer was stayed on June
7.
A Toronto-based Crown lawyer
decided there was no likely prospect of a conviction.
The Crown entered a stay,
not a withdrawal, of the charge to allow re-opening the file within a year should
new evidence come forward.
Richer was working in Baker
Lake on Jan. 4, 2002, when the charge was laid.
Two weeks later, the 14-year
RCMP veteran resigned and moved with his common-law spouse to southern Ontario.
Richer could not be reached
for comment.
His lawyer, Michael Chandler,
would not say what action, if any, his client may take to clear his name.
"I have not had an
opportunity to talk to him very much so I dont want to make any comment
until weve had the opportunity to speak in more detail. Im loathe
to say anything until such time I have clearance from him or if he wants to
speak to you himself," Chandler said.
However, a friend of Richer
who asked not to be named suggested the charge was the result of a "witch
hunt."
RCMP Inspector Jim MacDougal
of Nunavuts V Division said the charge followed a thorough police investigation.
"We treat that sort
of investigation [possession of child pornography] the same, whether its
one of our own members or a member of the public.
"We followed all avenues
of the investigation and put the package forward to the Crown. Our job is to
decide if there is reasonable, probable grounds to lay the charge. In this case
obviously, we felt that there were," MacDougall said.
MacDougall couldnt
discuss the circumstances or the evidence leading to the single-count charge.
"The stay of proceedings
means he can be brought to court within a year and theres always the possibility
it will be brought back so to comment on the evidence would be premature,"
he said.
|