July 12, 2002
Makivik, QIA team up to
investigate dog slaughter
Organizations call for
public inquiry, begin their own investigations
SARA
ARNATSIAQ
Inuit organizations in
Nunavik and Baffin Island are at last investigating the mass slaughter of dogs
that occurred in the regions in the late 1950s.
Makivik Corporation has
completed 200 interviews as part of its information-gathering. It is also looking
into making a documentary to be produced by the Taqramiut Nipingat Inc., the
television broadcaster for Nunavik.
The Qikiqtani Inuit Association
says it is preparing to start collecting information and evidence on the dog
slaughter this fall, so that Baffin beneficiaries can get compensation. It is
not just financial compensation they want they also want a public apology.
The QIA board formed a
dog slaughter committee at an executive meeting in Grise Fiord in April. It
approved a budget of $30,000 to start collecting information and evidence to
prove that the slaughter actually took place.
This information will eventually
be brought to the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs and the Solicitor
General.
Representatives from QIA
will be going to South Baffin communities between September and November to
interview people. After the information has been gathered, it will be organized
and the accounts of witnesses will be further reviewed for more details.
Inuit from the Baffin,
High Arctic, and Nunavik regions suffered slaughter of their dogs between 1950
and 1975.
"The only means to
travel"
Akesuk Joamie, a resident
of Iqaluit, had his own dog team when he landed in Apex in 1957. He said he
and his father each had their own teams. In those days, the dogs could roam
freely. It was in Apex that it first became mandatory for dogs to be tied up.
"When we started living
in Apex, we were told that the dogs had to be tied up. Even when our dogs were
tied up, they still got shot. Some that I heard about, others I saw with my
own eyes," Joamie said.
"The dogs were the
only means to travel. I thought that this was supposed to happen, because the
white man was intimidating. They knew everything and were domineering. I felt
at the time that we couldnt do anything."
The situation was complicated
by the fact that the Inuit were not given an explanation for the slaughter in
their own language. "There were no interpreters in those days, it was never
explained," Joamie said.
QIA and Makivik have formed
a partnership to deal with the matter. The presidents of both organizations
have signed a joint letter to the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs requesting
that a public inquiry take place.
The Department of Indian
and Northern Affairs has not formally responded to the letter. According to
Jocelyn Barrett, a lawyer for Makivik, the department has said there are no
records of the slaughter and that there was no policy made to destroy dogs.
Makivik Corporation has
interviewed at least 200 people who suffered through the slaughter themselves,
in addition to witnesses and relatives of people who lost their dogs. This information
has been translated to English.
The people of Nunavik have
an ally in their Member of Parliament, Guy St. Julien, who has been vocal on
the issue. Recently a petition was started in the communities, and Makivik is
asking that the petitions be signed and sent to St. Juliens office by
Aug. 1.
Makivik has been asking
for an inquiry, but if there are other ways of investigating the matter, such
as using an independent investigator, theyre willing to look into that.
Because the slaughter took
place 40 or 50 years ago, it is difficult to gather the information or evidence
because there were no written records of the activities that took place.
In addition, the federal
government is denying that the slaughter took place.
A former RCMP officer who
witnessed the slaughter passed away recently in Kuujjuaq. Others who witnessed
it are now elders, and some of them are passing away as well.
|