|
August 2, 2002
GN, NTI settle NNI squabble
No more grandfathering
after April 1, 2003
JIM
BELL
Lawyers representing Nunavut
Tunngavik Inc. and the government of Nunavut wont be facing off in court
after all.
The squabbling organizations
announced this week that theyve reached a settlement in their dispute
over the Nunavut governments unilateral one-year extension of "Nunavut
business" status to a group of 35 long-established companies.
The deal is made up
of three elements:
A promise by the
government of Nunavut not to extend its grandfathering agreement which
provides "Nunavut business" status to non-compliant companies
beyond March 31, 2003;
A detailed process
for consulting NTI if the government proposes changes or adds new policies for
carrying out its obligations under Article 24 of the Nunavut land claims agreement,
and;
the appointment
of an "advisor" to suggest solutions to the current impasse over the
mandate of a board that would hear appeals on NNI contract awards.
"Im sure it
will improve a lot of things, and that the GN will consult with NTI on any changes
in the future," James Eetoolook, NTIs first vice-president, said
this week. "So hopefully they will live up to their commitment in the future."
The "Nunavut business"
label gives certain firms a 14-per-cent competitive advantage when bidding on
Nunavut government tenders. ("Inuit-owned" companies may claim an
extra three per cent, while "local" companies may claim another three-per-cent
advantage on top of that.)
Its similar to the
"northern business" designation used under the Northwest Territories
old business incentive policy, or "BIP."
On April 1, 2000, the GN
replaced the BIP with the NNI to comply with Article 24 of the Nunavut land
claims agreement.
About three dozen companies
lost that status because they didnt meet some or all parts of the NNI
policys definition of "Nunavut business," such as having a resident
manager in Nunavut or majority ownership by Nunavut residents.
That group includes Inuit-owned
firms such as Norterra, and non-Inuit-owned firms such as Tower Arctic and Northern
stores. To ease their way into compliance with the new rules, the GN gave them
a two-year grace period, ending March 31, 2002. That provision became known
as "the grandfathering clause."
But on April 5, after intense
lobbying from some of those companies, the GN extended the grandfathering period
by one year.
NTI officials denounced
the move, calling it a violation of the Nunavut land claims agreement.
So on May 3, NTI lawyers
gave notice that they would ask the Nunavut court of justice to quash the GNs
one-year extension of the grace period.
Eetoolook said NTIs
executive did this as a last resort, after they exhausted all other ways of
changing the GNs mind.
"We tried everything
through correspondence, through meetings of our staffs, through meetings
at the political level, and even through the media, and so at the end, the executive,
with the blessings of the board, decided to take the course that we have made,
and agreed that if we can settle anything out of court, we will settle,"
Eetoolook said.
|