December 13, 2002
Nunavik groups worry as
species at risk act looms
No recovery plan, no
beluga hunting
ODILE
NELSON
Nunavimmiut officials voiced
strong concerns last week that the federal governments upcoming Species
at Risk Act will bring an abrupt end to traditional beluga harvests in the Ungava
Bay and Eastern Hudson Bay areas.
The latest draft of Canadas
endangered species act, which now stands before the Senate and is expected to
pass in the near future, officially establishes an arms-length wildlife management
body that will classify all wildlife as either extinct, endangered, threatened,
of special concern, or not at risk.
Any species the board classifies
as endangered or threatened then becomes illegal to hunt, capture or destroy.
Inuit leaders fear the
act, known as Bill C-5, could outlaw an essential part of traditional Inuit
life, since the proposed list already names the Ungava beluga population as
endangered and the Eastern Hudson Bay population as threatened.
The federal governments
latest numbers suggest there are less than 200 beluga in the Ungava population
and about 4,000 in the Eastern Hudson group. Nunavik hunters, however, dispute
these numbers.
Paulusi Novalinga, head
of the Nunavik Hunters, Fishers and Trappers Association, said he and his colleagues
from Makivik Corporation and the Kativik Regional Government brought their concerns
to representatives from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans at the first
meeting of the newly-formed "beluga recovery team" on Dec. 3-4 in
Kuujjuaq.
"If that bill is passed
its going to affect all our beluga harvest," Novalinga said in an
interview this week. "[I told them] if theyre going to totally say
that there wont be any more beluga harvest, I am afraid that my people
might react to that negatively. I say that as a peacekeeper between the government
and my people. Its a sensitive matter that has to do with our tradition
and culture. Thats whats at stake. Beluga is part of our heritage."
The Department of Fisheries
and Oceans decided to establish a recovery team for the two beluga populations
at the beginning of this year. However the group, which consists of that KRG,
Makivik, NHTA, DFO and Nunavut wildlife representatives, only met for the first
time last week.
Anne Lagacé, one
of the two DFO representatives on the team, said it was always the federal departments
plan to establish a recovery team for the Nunavik beluga populations that would
consult heavily with Nunaviks Inuit.
But with the approval of
Bill C-5 looming, she said the need to have a recovery plan in place became
more pressing.
"The act doesnt
make it necessary to have a team in place right now. But once the act is passed
there will be a very short deadline to put recovery teams in place and develop
strategies [before hunting of an endangered or threatened species is outlawed],"
Lagacé said.
Lagacé stressed
the act is still in draft form and that its wording remains incomplete. At this
point, she said, it is very difficult to assess how developed the teams
recovery strategies would have to be to avoid a complete ban on beluga hunting.
But she also said the prohibitions
would not be enforced in the same way for aboriginal subsistence hunting, if
the team could develops concrete actions to alleviate the pressure on the two
beluga populations.
"The Species at Risk
Act is based on wording of land claims agreements, in that it says aboriginal
people will be able to continue hunting species at risk if conservation principles...
are met. Then hunting could be allowed to a certain extent," Lagacé
said. "Putting in place the recovery team is one way to see that actions
will be taken, or suggested I should say, so that the conservation principle
is met for those two endangered populations."
Novalinga, however, said
DFO officials at the meeting could not promise the recovery teams suggestions
would prevent a complete moratorium on beluga hunting when the act is passed.
The recovery team will
meet again in the spring and hopes to have a firm list of suggestions in place
for the 2004 hunting season.
No one at Environment Canada
could be reached to confirm when Bill C-5 would be passed.
|