January 17, 2003
Beluga-debate season opens
in Nunavik
KRG-organized meeting
brings DFO and elders together
ODILE
NELSON
The Kativik Regional Government
is hailing a recent meeting between Nunavik elders and Department of Fisheries
and Oceans scientists as a potential turning point in the ongoing dispute over
the federal governments beluga quotas.
"The DFO has been
having quite a few problems getting people to work with the quotas. A lot of
people are saying the DFO are wrong about the beluga disappearing," Sammy
Tukkiapik, a regional agent for KRGs renewable resources department, said
this week.
"We had one or two
people from the Hudson Coast area who didnt believe, but once they saw
everything they said, Now I understand. Now Ill tell other hunters
that they are in decline and Ill go tell other hunters that they should
respect quotas."
Tukkiapik organized the
Jan. 7 to 8 meeting at the DFO research institute in Mont-Joli, Que. He said
the gathering offered DFO marine researchers the chance to clarify the science
behind their claims the Eastern Hudson Bay beluga population is dwindling and
the Ungava Bay population is endangered.
Their explanations had
a significant impact on some of the elders, he said.
"For example, we found
out at the meeting how they decide where each beluga comes from in the region.
The DFO has always said there are three different stocks in the North and they
tell them apart by DNA. Its very hard to explain to elders how DNA shows
where stocks come from. But this is the kind of thing that was explained at
the meeting," Tukkiapik said.
Last year, the DFO set
a hunting quota of 15 belugas per community after 2001 aerial surveys showed
the Eastern Hudson Bay beluga population had dropped to 2000 whales and the
Ungava Bay population was less than 200. The DFO also banned whaling in the
Ungava Bay and Eastern Hudson Bay regions.
But many Inuit hunters
disputed the findings. They said they had seen hundreds of belugas migrating
through the Hudson Strait during the spring.
Though the DFO explained
these whales included beluga from the healthy Western Hudson Bay population,
Nunavimmiut claimed it showed the DFOs aerial estimations were incorrect.
As a result, some individuals and communities defied the federal government
and openly exceeded the DFOs quota.
Mike Hammill, a scientist
with the DFOs marine mammal section, said the meeting gave both scientists
and elders ample opportunity to express their respective beliefs.
"The point that we
made very clearly ... [was that] 15 years ago there were about 4,000 whales
in the Eastern Hudson Bay population. Today there are only about 2,000.... So
in some ways were missing 2,000 whales. And if you look around in other
areas you cant find these 2,000 whales," Hammill said.
With this point clearly
on the table, Hammill said DFO researchers then addressed different suggestions
Inuit have made over the years to explain the disappearance.
They opened by presenting
a study about the effects of outboard motor noise on beluga migration. Inuit
have long maintained that motor noise is driving the beluga away from Nunaviks
coast, making them hard to count.
Hammill told the elders
the study supports the idea that beluga in the North are going further offshore
when they hear boat motors. But he also suggested to them that this behaviour
might not be related to noise alone.
"We said that Yes,
beluga in North Quebec react to noise by moving off shore, but we also
said that its probably linked to the idea that every time they hear noise
theres a bullet associated with it and a bad experience," Hammill
said. "Because if you go to the St. Lawrence River or you go to Churchill
in the Western Hudson Bay [where there is little or no beluga hunting] if the
whales hear noise underwater they actually follow the boats."
By meetings end,
scientists had also argued that noise, disease and killer whale attacks together
could not account for the massive population drop, and that aerial surveys and
satellite tracking provide accurate measurements of beluga numbers and migration.
The scientists wanted to
address the most prominent Inuit claims against the DFOs findings, Hammill
said.
"The Northerners tend
to say, Well, the whales have just moved offshore, but when you
look offshore through aerial surveys you cant account for 2,000 missing
whales. Then people say, Well, theyve just gone into James Bay or
gone into Western Hudson Bay, but if you look at the satellite telemetry
[tracking] data you see the whales just go offshore and then come in shore.
They go back and forth. This, to us, indicates that they arent leaving
the territory. Theyre hanging around during the summer and the reason
why weve lost 2,000 whales isnt a problem of migration but that
theyve been shot or killed," Hammill said.
Yet despite the explanations,
and the KRGs perception that the meeting could mark a change in the beluga
debate, elders interviewed by Nunatsiaq News this week offered only a cautious
endorsement of the scientists finding.
David Oovaut, an elder
from Quaqtaq, said the meeting was convincing overall.
"The beluga population
looks as though there is no change, but theres information out there saying
theres less and they [the DFO] sound legitimate," Oovaut said.
Oovaut, however, said he
was still not sure all the methods used by the DFO were completely accurate.
"Aerial surveys also
show that belugas may be in danger of extinction but as for aerial surveys I
am not too sure," Oovaut said.
Davidee Niviaxie, the elder
representing Umiujaq, said he felt the DFO and Inuit elders at the meeting continued
to misunderstand each other.
"The DFO didnt
really value the Inuit traditional knowledge. We listened to each other but
we couldnt agree on the value of traditional Inuit knowledge. Theres
the DFO view, then theres the hunters view. They couldnt agree."
Yet despite his concerns,
Niviaxie said he would join Oovaut and four other elders on a cross-Nunavik
tour of the meetings results this spring.
|