|
February 14, 2003
Illegal apartment may cost
firm $10,000
City cracks down on
errant staff house in Tundra Valley building
MIRIAM
HILL
The city is cracking down
on developers who violate municipal bylaws by hitting them in the wallet.
During a meeting on Feb.
11, city council accepted administrations recommendation to seek a summary
conviction against Steenberg Construction for breaching of the zoning bylaw.
The city hopes to levy
a $10,000 fine against the company to reflect the amount of time city staff
have spent on the file. The bylaw gives the city the authority to charge a fine
of $30,000.
"Enforcement of the
zoning bylaw is important," Chrystal Fuller, the director of lands and
planning, told city councillors. "You have to start somewhere."
Councillor Lynda Gunn agreed,
saying the city has to send a clear message to developers that its rules will
be enforced.
Steenberg Construction
was issued a development permit for a single-family dwelling in Tundra Valley.
In August, the city received a complaint that the house contained an illegal
apartment. Fuller said Jens Steenberg, the owner of the construction company,
spoke with a bylaw officer and denied having an apartment in the building.
At the end of November,
Fuller sent a letter to Steenberg asking for confirmation in writing that the
building had no apartment. She said she received no response, but on Dec. 2
a development officer received a phone call from Mike Osland, a lawyer representing
the firm. He confirmed the building had an illegal unit.
On Dec. 3, the city received
a conditional-use application to approve the building as a two-family dwelling
or a lodging or boarding house.
Fuller said this isnt
the first time Steenberg has been before council to explain a breach of bylaws.
In November 2001, Steenberg constructed a three-story, multi-family unit in
the eastern end of the city, but he had only applied for a permit to build a
two-story, single-family house. A stop-work order was issued. At that time council
directed administration to seek means to levy a fine against Steenberg, but
that never happened.
Fuller said a number of
factors played into that decision, including a lack of employees in the lands
department, the fact a fine hadnt been sought in recent memory, the fruitless
efforts of the development officer to build a file to bring to court and an
oral briefing by the officer when he left his position that the summary conviction
process had begun, when, in fact, it hadnt.
In an interview Feb. 12,
Steenberg said $10,000 seemed like an awful lot of money for the city to spend
in staff time on his file, and that a fine was unjustified.
"I dont think
thats fair at all," he said. "I think thats totally outrageous."
Steenberg maintained he
has always said there was a unit in the building and that it was used for his
staff. He said the citys plan to crack down on developers who arent
following the bylaws is just an added hurdle for people who want to help the
city grow.
"I think [developers]
get punished all the time from the city," he said. "I think just to
do construction in this town can be very hard and difficult."
He said contractors dont
feel they have much cooperation from the city in many areas.
"If the city councillors
took a walk through this town, they might be surprised by how people actually
live. There are staff houses everywhere in this town and theyre not registered
or anything," he said.
Unaalik Aviation, which
wants to buy the building, was waiting for a decision from council about whether
they could use the unit as a staff house.
City council granted a
conditional-use permit, making the staff housing legal.
|