|
Nunavut Edition Headline News
May 27, 1998
Arctic social science researchers
debate ethics
Should some aboriginal knowledge
be kept secret? That's just one difficult ethical issue facing Arctic social
scientists who met last week in Copenhagen.
JANE GEORGE
Nunatsiaq News
COPENHAGEN - For Sami anthropologist Marit Myrvall ethical issues surrounding
research are never easy to resolve.
"But I now think that we have to debate these challenges and not
leave them to the individual," said Myrvall.
Myrvall, who heads the Sami Institute in Guovvdageaidnu, Norway did her
own field research in India with Tibetan refugees. There, she was able to
evaluate her research methods from the other side, as a stranger working
in a foreign culture.
This experience is helping her now as she begins research within her
own Sami community on new Sami shamanism.
"As a researcher I represent the scientific tradition of knowledge
and my professional tools are not much different from other researchers,"
she said.
"When researchers belonging to the indigenous community begin to
produce knowledge about their own culture and traditions, knowing that certain
kind of knowledge is not supposed to be of access to all, how do we do research
on that? Where do we draw the line? Or do we?"
New guidelines
A recent international gathering of social scientists, many of whom are
Sami, Greenlandic or from Russian and Alaskan native communities, unanimously
adopted a set of principles and guidelines for circumpolar research.
The new principles of the International Association of Arctic Social
Scientists include some self-evident and basic philosophical principles.
These include respect for people and information, and maintaining the
equality of power and the practice of freedom with equality.
"Adherence to these principles provides the foundation and the threshold
from which the inherent sense of beauty, grace and harmony, wholeness of
the land, animals and people may emerge," reads the organization's
statement.
A set of 10 working guidelines were also adopted. These talk about such
issues as the importance of obtaining informed consent, and maintaining
constant consultation and communication with any people involved in research.
Practicing standards
Myrvall said that every researcher will have the responsibility to act
according to these principles. But this doesn't mean they shouldn't act
primarily on their on their own sense of what's right.
"First, you have to act and the standard will grow out of it. Like
when you smile and then you feel better," she said.
She offered the example of a researcher working on Sami rock burials
who carefully reburied any objects she found and did not divulge their location.
Yet even if researchers appeared to support a stronger ethical approach
to research practices, the debate around the role of traditional knowledge
and its role in research is far from over.
The statement adopted by IASSA also said that "efforts should be
made to incorporate local and traditional knowledge and experience"
into research.
Exploiting knowledge?
But even if many researchers are, in fact, increasingly studying traditional
knowledge and incorporating it into their work, many raised the possible
misundestanding or exploiting of this knowledge.
Nunavut Arctic College student Susan Enuaraq wasn't sure she like the
idea of freely sharing traditional knowledge.
"For a person like me who's seen people capitalizing on Inuit knowledge
and culture, it's very hurtful," she told the IASSA gathering.
But other researchers said that traditional knowledge is no different
>from any other kind of knowledge.
"Every piece of knowledge is about sharing," said Russian anthropologist
Igor Krupnik. "It's not created to be shut up and locked. The Yupik
elders say that 'when you're stingy with your sharing your knowledge, it
rots your mouth.'"
Krupnik said that he's tired of having scientific knowledge and researchers
being portrayed as dangerous.
He said science and scientists have compatible ethical standards and
even their own kind of "elders" who help prevent the flow of incorrect
or destructive information.
IASSA intends to continue discussion around these issues before the organization
meets again in 2001 at the Groupe d'etudes inuit and circumpolaires at Laval
University in Quebec City.
|